Therapist Website Studio

Reviewing answers

We log a wrong public fact. We do not chase the model.

If an answer names the wrong fee, town or status, the correction is the page and the listings you control. A single chat is a note, not a measurement, and we do not publish the transcript.

Get my free website reviewBook a free 20-minute consultation

See pricing

Example bespoke sites

Alder Quay is a designed example of a practice website. Alder Quay is not the subject of a real AI answer. It is a designed example.

alderquay.exampleDesigned example
Alder QuayWrite
A couple talking with a therapist in a bright room

Couples therapy · Bristol or online

For the pattern between you

Two adults. You can come together, or one of you can write first. 60 minutes · £90.

A therapist and a client talking in chairs by a window
  1. 1

    Who is in the room

    Couples therapy is for two of you. Relationship therapy is for one person, when the other is not coming.

  2. 2

    The fee is on the page

    £90 for 60 minutes, in Bristol or online, before you decide to write.

  3. 3

    A short note

    Names, an email, and in person or online. You do not need to tell the story in the form.

A woman speaking with a therapist in a bright room

Relationship therapy · one person

When you want to look at it alone

£90

60 minutes. For one person who wants to understand a relationship, when the other person is not in the room. Same fee as couples therapy.

Bristol or online. Cancellation sits on the same page as the fee.

Names, an email, and where you would like to meet. Leave the story of the relationship out of the form.

Start a conversation

Alder Quay Therapy

Bristol · Couples and relationship therapy

Open this concept

Designed example

SEO, AI AEO and language models

review of AI answers about a practice, ready for the four answer engines.

We focus on crawlable HTML and structured data for the review of AI answers about a practice. Google, ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity are where that service shows up. The design is the easy part.

  • Google

    Search · AI Overviews · Gemini

    Google can retrieve the review of AI answers about a practice because a review of AI answers about a practice puts a log of a wrong public fact, corrected on the page, with no sample transcript in ordinary HTML, where a crawler can read it without a script.

    • Googlebot
    • Google-Extended

  • OpenAI

    ChatGPT

    ChatGPT search reads the page once OAI-SearchBot fetches it, where the a review of AI answers about a practice sentence a model can cite is a log of a wrong public fact, corrected on the page, with no sample transcript, not a broader label.

    • OAI-SearchBot
    • GPTBot
    • ChatGPT-User

  • Anthropic

    Claude

    Claude indexes the page as text: structured data for a review of AI answers about a practice repeats a log of a wrong public fact, corrected on the page, with no sample transcript and does not add a claim the page does not show.

    • Claude-SearchBot
    • ClaudeBot
    • Claude-User

  • Perplexity

    Perplexity

    Perplexity can cite the review of AI answers about a practice because the next public link from a review of AI answers about a practice is a real page on this site, beside a log of a wrong public fact, corrected on the page, with no sample transcript.

    • PerplexityBot
    • Perplexity-User

Under the surface

a review of AI answers about a practice, shown as data.

This block is on the page because AI reviews get published as transcripts, so the log of the wrong fact is shown because the transcript is not evidence we will print. That is the layer we focus on and care about, and the sample matches the a review of AI answers about a practice a person can read.

JSON-LD · schema.orgWhat the crawler is given
{
  "@type": "Service",
  "name": "a review of AI answers about a practice",
  "serviceType": "Reviews of AI answers about a practice",
  "description": "a log of a wrong public fact, corrected on the page, with no sample transcript"
}

The website we deliver

The review of AI answers about a practice we deliver

Inside a project the note has four fields: the date, the product you looked at, the wrong fact, and the URL that should be right. We do not store the clinical content of a prompt. We do not ask you to paste a client’s name into a chat to test it. The fix is the website sentence, the directory bio, or the profile, whichever was stale. We do not email an AI company as a service. Search Console is not where those answers appear, so we do not pretend to export them. The free review can look at the public site. It does not include a tour of chat products.

The usual way in for review of AI answers about a practice is Standard Managed: £149 setup and £49 a month for 12 months, then Website Care at £39. Growth Managed is £249 and £69 a month when each real service needs its own page, then £49. Prices include VAT. Outright is £650 or £995. The domain stays in your name. The monthly fee is management, and the site is not paid off when the fee drops.

How this review of AI answers about a practice is built for search and AI answers

Google’s AI documentation is why we treat answers as unstable. A corrected page can be recrawled or not. We do not date the correction in the model. Structured data is updated with the sentence, not instead of it. An anonymised “example answer” on this page would be fiction, so there is not one. The same facts sit in the HTML and in structured data, so Google, ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity can quote a log of a wrong public fact, corrected on the page, with no sample transcript.

What the log leaves out

No transcript. No client detail. No score for how “visible” you were that day.

If the answer was wrong because the old site is still public, the redirect or the edit is the work, inside the published project.

What we publish for a review of AI answers about a practice, and what we leave off.
On the page we buildLeft off
Wrong fact namedA pasted chat
URL that should be trueA prompt we send to a vendor
Page correctedA promise the model updates
No client in the testA name typed into a chat

What stays with you

We do not publish sample AI answers, and we do not promise a model will correct itself. You approve the public words. We do not write treatment, consent forms or clinical records, and we do not promise a ranking, an enquiry total, or a mention in an AI answer.

A free website review, or a free consultation

A free website review if you already have a public site, or a free 20-minute consultation if you do not.

Get my free website reviewBook a free 20-minute consultation

review of AI answers about a practice, on the published price.

a review of AI answers about a practice is part of the published website offer. It is not a new price, and it does not buy rankings or AI mentions.

Growth Managed

£249

setup

+ £69/month

Then Growth Website Care at £49/month after 12 months.

Choose Growth

Or buy outright

£650

or £995

Pay in full, or across 3 payments. Those payments are not the managed plan.

See outright prices

Prices include VAT. Your domain stays in your name. The monthly fee is management, and the site is not paid off when the fee drops.

See what is included

Questions

Can you make ChatGPT update?
No. We can correct the public page.
Should I test with a client’s name?
No.
Is this the free review?
The review looks at the site. A chat log is not part of it.

Ready for a clear next step?

Request a free website design review if you already have a site, or book a free 20-minute consultation if you are starting from scratch.

Get my free website reviewBook a free 20-minute consultation

Or email hello@therapistwebsitestudio.co.uk.

Sources

Checked 4 October 2026. These pages explain the public rules. They are not a ranking promise.